Wednesday 10 April 2013

Inspiration will kill your book

Or,

'Why you should never listen to writing advice, including this - part 1.'

The title is wordy enough, so I didn't have time to be as specific as I wanted to be. If I were to properly title this series it would probably be something like this:

'A look at the kinds of writing advice that you may commonly receive but can safely ignore if you aren't a bit stupid.'

So if you aren't a bit stupid and you've ever been given sage advice about writing -- even from extremely successful writers --, read on. If you do consider yourself a bit stupid, well...geez. Buck up, pal. I don't think you're stupid! :-)


The 140 Characters Rule

Before I go on, you'll notice that a lot of this advice comes in a very specific form. It's catch phrase advice. Sound byte advice. You can fit it neatly into a tweet. Think of it as a 140 characters rule. If you can tweet it, be sceptical of it.

You'll come across writing advice that is much longer than this, of course. Stephen King wrote an entire book about writing, because he's meta like that, and extensive author interviews will often delve a little deeper than a pithy one-liner. When it comes to this kind of advice, always read it if you have the time and interest. Comprehensive advice is good. Lap that stuff up.

As for the other stuff, well. Let's have a look.



On Inspiration


I don't think it's a coincidence that advice about finding inspiration usually turns out to be full of the most uninspiring bullshit known to man. It's a thing that interviewers ask about a lot, and hence a thing that children and aspiring authors want to know a lot about. They don't want to be ogres when they answer these questions, and so they do what any rational adult does when backed into a corner by earnest, naive belief:

They make stuff up.

They're writers, they're good at it. This is when you start hearing a bunch of nonsense about walks in the woods, sunsets over oceans and -- WORST of all -- the dreaded 'muse'.

It's all waffle. It doesn't mean anything.

Here's a typical kind of quote you might see:

I sit in the dark and wait for a little flame to appear at the end of my pencil.
                                                       - Billy Collins

Oh, cool. That's nice, I suppose. Let's see what else there is.

You never have to change anything you got up in the middle of the night to write.
                                                     ― Saul Bellow

Hmm. I don't know that that's true. Well, how about this! It's a 20 minute TED talk by Elizabeth Gilbert, the writer of 'Eat, Pray, Love', and it's a kind of rambling speech about how creativity shouldn't be in the hands of creative people, but rather some undefined, vaguely extra-bodily thing called a Genius. If you have time, give it a listen. It's nice enough.



...Oh.

Well...uh, I suppose there's a lot to take away from this sort of thing. Like the...um. Huh. Well, maybe that...there...is...hm. Actually, you know what? There's nothing to take away. It's literally useless advice, packaged in such a way so that a non-discerning listener can nod and smile and think they've heard something profound.

There might be an existential level on which this vaguely makes sense, but that is not a plane on which an author can conduct the business of actually writing a novel. See? It's the perfect storm of uselessness. To make head or tail out of the topic of inspiration, you have to take yourself to a headspace that is completely non-conducive to being able to write.

The Unintended Consequences of Bad Advice

The net result of all of this is that new and aspiring writers will get off to a false start. They'll sit down and begin to write. They might last fifteen minutes or so, and then discover something odd. They aren't being struck by the inspiration that everyone was talking about. There's no fire at the end of their pencil. They haven't woken up in the middle of the night once to write anything. And though they have spent thousands of dollars demolishing their walls, they didn't find a thing that could be called a 'Genius' in there.

They will wonder what is wrong with them. They will assume that maybe this whole writing game isn't for them. If they were any good, after all, they'd have written a perfect first draft by now in the middle of the night with a fire pencil and gone out for shots with their Genius.

If this is you, reader, then please...don't listen to these inspiration addicts. I promise you, they are making it all up as they go along.

Who should I listen to about inspiration, then? 

Listen to the people who seem to have their head screwed on right. Thankfully, on this particular topic, it many of the most successful and admired writers tend to agree that hard work is the key. If you are lucky enough to be, or become, a successful author, don't do others the disservice of perpetuating the myth of inspiration. It's unhelpful. It will put newcomers off. There is just no good outcome. It's all lies.

Don't lie to children. Don't lie to people who look up to you. Be one of the good guys. Be Picasso. Yes, that's right. We've entered a parallel dimension in which Pablo Picasso, world famous painter of things that are on the extremity of nonsensical, is offering the most salient of advice on the topic.

'Inspiration exists,' he said, 'but it must find you working.'

Not on a bolt from the blue. Not injected into your veins by a sallow-faced, drug pushing muse. Not at the bottom of a basket of kittens and rainbows and sunshine.

Working. Turning an empty page into a full one. If there's inspiration to be found, it is there.

And once we admit that, well. Isn't it time we just gave the idea away entirely? It saves a step.

Friday 5 April 2013

Stephen King and the Wadsworth Constant

In the spring of my senior year at Lisbon High—1966, this would have been—I got a scribbled comment that changed the way I rewrote my fiction once and forever. Jotted below the machine-generated signature of the editor was this mot: "Not bad, but PUFFY. You need to revise for length. Formula: 2nd Draft = 1st Draft – 10%. Good luck."
               - Stephen King, On Writing

For EVERY youtube video, I always open the video and then immediately punch the slider bar to about 30 percent. For example, in this video, it should have just started at :40. Everything before :40 was a waste. This holds true for nearly every video in the universe.
                                                 - Reddit user Wadsworth



The expression goes 'less is more'. It's a cliche, and it's as often applied to cooking as it is to interior decorating as it is to drawing as it is to writing. But I think this might just be one of those good cliches, you know? One of those ones that became a cliche because it was so relentlessly true and applicable. Kind of like 'always let the Wookie win'.

Winner! ... again.



I was very intrigued a while ago when I was on the huge internet-dredging, high-tech collating service known as reddit and stumbled across reference to a thing called the Wadsworth Constant. You can find out all about it at that link, but it is basically the principle that any YouTube video can be skipped by about 30% and lose none of its intended purpose. And not just because everyone insists on shoving boring, loud and annoying intro graphics at the beginning of their videos.

Fascinating, isn't it, that it coincides so closely to all the advice about skipping the early parts of your novel? Stephen King advocates 10%, Ernest Hemingway said something along the lines of turning your first fifty pages into five. 'In late, out early' is another way I've heard it put.

I read a little while ago that it's more common than not for a first-time author to have their first chapter cut entirely from their manuscript. That's what made the Wadsworth Constant seem so universal to me. YouTubers are generally not professionals. They've found success in an amatuer medium, where nobody was around to tell them that they must cut the first thirty percent of their video because oh my gosh it is just SO BORING.

I've yet to be told by any industry professionals that I need to lose my first chapter, but if that day comes I will listen without question. I know the rule is true. I know it makes sense. It must, because it has sprung into existence in two entirely different realms, utterly independent of each other. That's called universality, and it applies in force to beginnings.

This whole movie should have been cut from the trilogy!
So, my advice for the day is this: if you're struggling with pace, or aren't getting any traction with your MS as it stands, snip the first chapter. Or two. Pepper the important stuff through the later ones, and see what happens.

And if it doesn't work out, blame Stephen King and Wadsworth. They're the ones you want, not me.

The Vogel Award

It's the time of year that publisher Allen & Unwin run the The Australian/Vogel's Literary Award, which is an exciting time of the year if you happen to be an unpublished author living in Australia under the age of thirty-five. As I happen to fit into that narrow corridor of eligibility, colour me excited!

Honestly, it's a good award run as a joint venture between two publishing giants, has a minimal entry fee, and results in a prize payout of $20,000 and a publishing contract with Allen and Unwin. I'll post the submission guidelines below.

The deadline is the 31st of May this year, so if you've got a manuscript you're ready to submit you might want to consider entering. This has been a public service announcement by me.


Submission Guidelines


•    Entrants must be aged under 35 years of age on 31 May 2013 (that is born after 31 May 1978).
•    Entries must be lodged by 31 May 2013.
•    Entrants must normally be residents of Australia.
•    The manuscript submitted with the entry form should be a work of fiction, Australian history or biography.
•    It must be a minimum length of 30,000 words and a maximum of 100,000 words.
•    The manuscript must be an original work, entirely by the entrant and it must be written in English.
•    It cannot be under consideration to any other publisher or entered into any other award.
•    No more than 10% of the manuscript can have been previously published in print form, or in electronic form, on a commercial basis.
•    Allen & Unwin will publish the winning entry, and will have exclusive worldwide publishing rights to it, and to any other entry they feel is of sufficient merit.
•    Entry fee of $25 is applicable to each manuscript entered.
•    The judges’ decision is final and no correspondence will be entered into.
•    The judges shall have the discretion to divide the prize equally between authors of entries they consider to be of equal merit. If, in their opinion, no entry is worthy of the prize, no winner shall be chosen. No entrant may win the prize in successive years.
•    The winner will be told in strict confidence during September 2013, at which time the winner must agree to keep this news absolutely confidential until the simultaneous announcement and publication of the winning entry in 2014.
•    Each entrant is required to agree to the above conditions of entry.
•    Breach of any conditions of entry will render an entry invalid.